Schumer and the Democrats admit they are against the actual parameters and duties of the Supreme Court
The judges in the USA have the responsibility of interpreting the laws of our country according to the words of the law. They are not supposed to apply their own political, social and/or moral philosophies to the laws of our country. The judge is supposed to be a neutral and non-partisan expert in the laws and the legal connections that they make.
“Schumer pronounced judgment on Gorsuch, saying that while the judge met all the legal qualifications, he wasn’t the liberal judge Republicans prevented President Obama from nominating in his final year. “Judge Gorsuch was unable to sufficiently convince me that he’d be an independent check on a president who has shown almost no restraint from executive overreach,” Schumer said. “Second, he was unable to convince me that he would be a mainstream justice who could rule free from the biases of politics and ideology.”
Why would a judge be liberal? Wouldn’t that make him a poor judge? Wouldn’t that mean the judge was unethical? Schumer and the democrats only want a judge that aligns to their anti-USA policies and practices. They want a judge that doesn’t agree with Trump. They are not after the fair and judicial equality as promised in our Constitution, Bill of Rights and so on. They want an UNETHICAL AND LIBERAL ACTIVIST JUDGE.
A possible explanation to Nunes’ actions: 47 HARD DRIVES AND 600M PAGES OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION ACQUIRED
It seems even more apparent to me that Nunes’ actions were because he realized the congressional committees supposedly involved in the matters about surveillance and intelligence collection were actually complicit in the activities by O’s administration and the FBI and NSA etc.
At this link you will see the letter and backstory to the actions of Mr. Klayman who is the Chairman and General Counsel of Freedom Watch, Inc. which ALREADY HAS THE EVIDENCE THAT O’s administration and alphabet-soup agencies were surveying and collecting private intelligence on for example of prominent Americans, such as the chief justice of the Supreme Court, other justices, 16 judges, prominent businessmen, and others such as President Donald Trump. Note – these apparently are individuals who would disagree with O and his liberal democrats who were busy changing the USA into an unsafe socialist country which encouraged the illegal immigration of extremist-muslims from all over the world and illegal immigrants via Mexico.
Our government has become willingly hijacked because of the ignorant and stupid voting practices of the citizens of the USA in electing O for two terms.
Understand this: if you voted for Trump to be President of the USA it may very well be that your senator and representative are cunningly working to undermine his presidency and his agenda which we have elected him to do. We all need to put almost unbearable pressure on our congress members to fully back him and work to get things fixed in our country. TPTB will be throwing BIG $$$ behind Congress members who are anti-Trump and in essence anti-USA. We need to push back harder than when we pushed back against them in the recent presidential election.
Did you see the stories yesterday of individuals on the intelligence committee and other Congress members exasperating and swirling innuendo about the actions of Nunes in not consulting them before going to Trump and to citizens of the country. You know why? SUPPRESSION OF THE FACTS WAS NOT ACCOMPLISHED!
(Below is a hodge podge of abstractions from various reporting.)
House of Representatives’ investigation into the NSA’s surveillance of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, the chairman of the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), said today that members of the Donald Trump transition team, possibly including Trump himself, were under surveillance during the Obama administration following November’s election.
Nunes told reporters that communications from the Trump team were picked up and disseminated within the government during the 2016 campaign. Nunes said sources within the intelligence community presented him with the information. He spoke to the press after briefing the administration.
“We don’t actually know yet officially what happened to General Flynn,” Nunes said of how communications from Gen. Flynn’s calls were leaked to the press. “We just know that his name leaked out but we don’t know how it was picked up yet. That was one of the things that we asked for in the March 15th letter, was for the NSA, CIA, and FBI to get us all the unmasking that was done.”
“And I’ll tell you, NSA is being cooperative,” Nunes continued, “but so far the FBI has not told us whether or not they’re going to respond to our March 15th letter, which is now a couple of weeks old.”
Nunes also reported that as of now, he “cannot rule out” President Obama ordering the surveillance.
And contrary to earlier media reports, Nunes clarified that the surveillance was not related to the FBI’s investigation into possible collusion with Russia. This surveillance, he emphasized to reporters, does not “have anything to do with Russia.”
Nunes just said there are “multiple FISA warrants out there” involving Trump.
Nunes said the surveillance appears to have been legal, incidental collection and that it does not appear to have been related to concerns over collusion with Russia.
- above emphasis added by me
Watch now over the next 72 hours the twisting MSM will do with this information and evidence. TPTB will be working hard to provide new story lines to “switch the channel” on the average citizen’s attention span to their MSM news diet.
Question for those not seeing the obvious. Why was the NSA and possibly other intelligence agencies collecting surveillance of the Trump transition team if it had nothing to do with Russia?
It is import to quit using the word “wire-tap” in reference to what OBAMA and his administration did in using government resources and agencies to listen and read conversations and correspondence in the Trump Plaza and elsewhere prior to the election.
Using the word wire-tap gives all those who are guilty a pass. Because they can CORRECTLY deny that it was ever done.
You need to use the correct vocabulary in describing the illegal and unethical work Obama and his administration did in breaching Mr. Trump and all his staff etc. privacy.
CNN is already saying that if it did happen it wouldn’t have been necessarily with O’s knowledge.
Pelosi of course is protecting O.
Rubio doesn’t know about the basis for this either (no surprise there).
MSM says they don’t know of any proof.
Clearly MSM is waiting for the proof that O cronies/establishment/globalists will give them.
No surprise there either.
Reading and hearing about the fact of Dems behavior yesterday at the speech by President Trump (it is SO good to be able to type out the name of the President of the USA ).
One great summary is located here – which by the way is a great resource about the news and some fair handed analysis.
I commented on the story but the more I think about it, I figured I should comment here.
Hypocrisy & immaturity – trademarks of the Dems. But u know what it may have clearly revealed to everyone with a discerning spirit – that the list of “causes/issues” really isn’t aligned to their values/passions/beliefs. Their values and passion is ALL about how to keep power. So they lost the Presidential election and control over the Congress, so now they sulk because they want those in their home states to continue to vote for them in so they can retain their power & prestige. Which then begs to ask/inquire about – so then why would the Dems actually manage the issues in a manner that they could be as quickly as possible – resolved to the best of its ability? Why would they handle some sensitive subject matter in a way that would promote unity and understanding instead of division? Because if they would do so – they lose their identity in politics and quite possibly their power and prestige —- their office.