Grand Jury Proceeding by the Peoples´ Court of Public Opinion
Empowering Public Conscience through Natural Law
‘Injustice to One is an Injustice to All’
We, a group of international lawyers and a judge, hereby announce that we will
conduct a criminal investigation modeled after the United States Grand Jury
proceedings. This Grand Jury Investigation serves as a model legal proceeding to
present to a jury (consisting of the citizens of the world) all available evidence of
COVID-19 Crimes Against Humanity to date against “leaders, organizers, instigators
and accomplices” who aided, abetted or actively participated in the formulation and
execution of a common plan for a pandemic. Crimes to be investigated include all acts
performed or omitted by a person in pursuance of a common design to commit
Crimes Against Humanity, and all such criminal acts condemned in the various
communities of jurors around the world.
This investigation is of the people, by the people and for the people and will be
referred to as the ‘Peoples´ Court of Public Opinion. Having been unable to find a
court to hear the actual evidence in the current system´s courts of law, we are
undertaking this proceeding outside of the current system and based on natural law.
This, in turn is founded on the firm belief that every person can easily distinguish
between good and evil, and between right and wrong.
15 minutes of fact and analysis
Robert David Steele said:
I pray this is disinformation. Together with Savin saying Biden would be inaugurated (even if illegitimately so), this is freaking the base out.
Martin Geddes responded:
You are watching a movie… a tightly scripted drama that manoeuvres every stakeholder group into just the right position at just the right time. People have to be shown, especially the reluctant libs. Their choices have consequences. Sometimes they are poor choices with terrible consequences.
There is a paradox in that exposing the evil and corruption makes it look like everything is going to hell, when it fact it is the precursor to ending it. Beisser’s Paradox of Change – we only change when we fully identify with what is, not what could or should be.
If the movie needs people being threatened with prison for not turning up for their mandatory vax, that’s what the narrative will do. Doesn’t mean what you are seeing is always genuine or the danger is what it appears to be. Some of the death and destruction and chaos will be very real, but everything is contained so that ultimately it is the path of least violence.