Election meddling 2020 – another method

EXCLUSIVE: Democrats Are Now Using Pentagon Funded Artificial Intelligence to Combat Online Efforts by Trump Supporters to Promote President Trump

 

Hill = Schiff, Soros, Steele, Mifsud, Ciaramella, NSC & McMaster

More damning details come out but not via so-called MSM or Legacy Media.

“star witness” Fiona Hill as reported by the Gateway Pundit.

and note in the article the tie to what is going to Roger Stone for outing her!

HOW IS MSM LYING TO U TODAY?

 

More proof…

The same networks that spent 2,202 minutes of collective airtime to push the Russia Collusion Media-Hoax are refusing to cover the Senate Intelligence Committee bipartisan report, which found no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The Media Research Center (MRC) did the research and found that between January 21, 2017, and February 10, 2019, “ABC’s World News Tonight, the CBS Evening News, and the NBC Nightly News [spent] 2,202 minutes on the Russia investigation [, which] accounted for nearly 19 percent of all Trump-related reporting [, and now] none of those three shows have even mentioned the investigation since NBC’s report came out on February 12.”

The same is true elsewhere on the left-wing networks.

“Neither CBS This Morning nor NBC’s Today have even acknowledged this new information from Senate investigators since the news broke on February 12,” MRC reports. “ABC’s Good Morning America briefly touched on it in a news brief totaling less than one minute on February 13.”

What’s especially fascinating is that NBC’s Ken Dilanian broke the original news of the Senate report, and NBC is still refusing to cover the story.

The reasons for this are quite obvious: the media know a reckoning is on the horizon, and they are buying time in the hopes of finding a way to wriggle out of it.

The rest of the Breitbart story here.

How is MSM lying to u today?

No, its not a cause for optimism

In the Federalist article: Democracy dies in the darkness when the media avoids extremists

Is an interesting article to read. My reason though for writing about it is the apparent sugar pill given at the end that may give the idea that not all things are reallly foul.

The second to last paragraph is:
“The common thread connecting these stories and others is the establishment media’s extreme reluctance to expose left-wing extremism, especially among elected Democrats or progressive leadership. If you are inclined toward optimism, you might conclude that at least the left’s late-term abortion and anti-Semitic factions are recognized by the media as sufficiently repellent that they cannot be covered neutrally or fairly without damaging the party. That is a very small silver lining to a very large, dark cloud.”

My 2 cents:
The reason they are not covering the radicalized liberal democrats/progressive leadership is because MSM does not want to provide more material as proof, to conservatives or others who appreciate and care about the well-being of our country, that the HEART of the democrats/progressives is TOXIC, MALEVOLENT and DESTRUCTIVE to our country and ALL OF THOSE WHO OPPOSE THEIR PHILOSOPHY, PRINCIPLES AND BEHAVIOR.

No silver lining there. MSM has and will continue to be complicit in the destruction and ruin of the USA.

2 cents on the madness

  1. The radicalized left which of course includes the MSM is saying that the young man wearing the red MAGA hat is at fault because he wore the red hat. That the red hat is akin to the white hoods of the KKK. That the red hat triggers a lot of people and because of that he should not be wearing it.   He wore it, his bad, his fault. Think a moment what that means. A liberal can wear Bernie, BHO or whatever – it is their right. And it is also their right to get in your face if u choose to wear your red MAGA hat. So in either instance, the liberal/left/radicalized individual is right. AS a conservative, u must deal with what they wear AND not wear what u want if the radicalized left doesn’t approve of it. Also – think about it – what else does it say? They say Sandman is at fault because he wore the red hat. Because of what he wore. Sound familiar? A lady wears a sexy outfit and gets raped; now using their flawed reasoning – it is her fault. She should know better. Her sexy outfit was going to trigger a rape response in some man. This all showing yet again, the radicalized left is unable to perform accurate, sound critical thinking.  This all showing the hypocrisy in their words and behavior.
  2. I think I have figured something out. We have video recordings of chuckie, nancy, etc. waxing eloquent over last 10-12 years that “yep we need a wall and better security on the borders”. Chief empty suit spoke the same rhetoric. They all pumped up their chests and beating them like Tarzan as a way to look tough. Mind u the issue wasn’t handled. But now, the opposite is occurring; is it JUST their hate of President Trump? I no longer think so. I think they lied all those years but knew they could “flex their muscles” (LIE) since they were in control. They never honestly intended to solve the problem because of among other reasons, the illegal votes they need to keep in power. They lied/spinned their rhetoric for fake news to broadcast around the world. President Trump in office and wants to deal with it fully has exposed to the world that chuckie, nancy, etc. were LIARS.