Schumer and the Democrats admit they are against the actual parameters and duties of the Supreme Court
The judges in the USA have the responsibility of interpreting the laws of our country according to the words of the law. They are not supposed to apply their own political, social and/or moral philosophies to the laws of our country. The judge is supposed to be a neutral and non-partisan expert in the laws and the legal connections that they make.
“Schumer pronounced judgment on Gorsuch, saying that while the judge met all the legal qualifications, he wasn’t the liberal judge Republicans prevented President Obama from nominating in his final year. “Judge Gorsuch was unable to sufficiently convince me that he’d be an independent check on a president who has shown almost no restraint from executive overreach,” Schumer said. “Second, he was unable to convince me that he would be a mainstream justice who could rule free from the biases of politics and ideology.”
Why would a judge be liberal? Wouldn’t that make him a poor judge? Wouldn’t that mean the judge was unethical? Schumer and the democrats only want a judge that aligns to their anti-USA policies and practices. They want a judge that doesn’t agree with Trump. They are not after the fair and judicial equality as promised in our Constitution, Bill of Rights and so on. They want an UNETHICAL AND LIBERAL ACTIVIST JUDGE.
Reading and hearing about the fact of Dems behavior yesterday at the speech by President Trump (it is SO good to be able to type out the name of the President of the USA ).
One great summary is located here – which by the way is a great resource about the news and some fair handed analysis.
I commented on the story but the more I think about it, I figured I should comment here.
Hypocrisy & immaturity – trademarks of the Dems. But u know what it may have clearly revealed to everyone with a discerning spirit – that the list of “causes/issues” really isn’t aligned to their values/passions/beliefs. Their values and passion is ALL about how to keep power. So they lost the Presidential election and control over the Congress, so now they sulk because they want those in their home states to continue to vote for them in so they can retain their power & prestige. Which then begs to ask/inquire about – so then why would the Dems actually manage the issues in a manner that they could be as quickly as possible – resolved to the best of its ability? Why would they handle some sensitive subject matter in a way that would promote unity and understanding instead of division? Because if they would do so – they lose their identity in politics and quite possibly their power and prestige —- their office.
President Hassan Rouhani said the last year’s nuclear deal “was the cheapest way to achieve Iran’s goals and interests.”
Speaking in Tehran on Saturday at an iftar meal breaking the Ramadan fast, Rouhani said the pre-Iran nuclear-deal era is past and Iran now needs to take advantage of the new atmosphere to pursue its “national interests more than before,” Iran’s Islamic Republic News Agency reported.
The country’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Saturday called for student associations to establish a “unified anti-US and anti-Zionist front” among the Muslim world’s students, Tasnim News Agency reported.
“By using advanced means of communication and in cyberspace, general campaigns can be formed by Muslim students based on the opposition to the policies of the US and the Zionist regime of Israel so that when needed, millions of young Muslim students create a big movement in the Islamic world,” he said.
In other words, what Rouhani was saying is that it is always wise to sacrifice a few pieces on the game board in order to capture the king.
There has been a non-stop stream of news involving the desire of many muslims to change the different countries in the world to their warped, barbaric and masochistic evil ungodly ways. All that Rouhani, Khamenei and other like in evil spirit have is their hate, belligerence & narcissism to fuel suffering, wickedness and death.
“By their fruits you shall know them.”
In the USA where the moniker of diversity has been twisted and used to force many wrong ideologies at the expense of individualism, liberty and freedom – one SHOULD think that its society would be rising and pressing our national government to do all it can to protect our people and allies from a religion that is against diversity.
But low and behold it is not happening. Instead what we have in the USA, is the people/party who hijacked the beauty and value of diversity, is the undying loyalty of these people to a religion which maims women, denigrates women, actively uses force and execution to eliminate opposition.
All the while the religion of Islam has its forces networking, planning for a new phase of bringing the world under its hideous sharia law.
The chief empty suit of the USA has done more to assist the treacherous Ayatollah than any president before him. NOW – His supporters are wanting to elect a new president with the same like mind. In four years from now, I wonder how far our country and the rest of the world will be in submission to Islam.
“This is a terrible feature of our age—that we are governed by protected people who don’t seem to care that much about their unprotected fellow citizens.
And a country really can’t continue this way.”
The article is here
Interesting that on the democratic side the reaction to our country’s “state of being” is either pure socialism (Sanders) or more of the same (ClintonDuo).
Yet another example of it not being allowed to communicate truth. PC is the mandatory communication paradigm of society here in many places around the world.
(Note: PC is often lies.)
Truth: We are NOT all muslims – thank God!!
[my two cents: isn’t interesting that it is the tone of the doctor that is apologized for. Nothing about the actual word content or the practices by the doctor.]
She says in the video: “We’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I’m not gonna crush that part, I’m gonna basically crush below, I’m gonna crush above, and I’m gonna see if I can get it all intact.”
[my two cents: But is not a baby, its an inconvenience. It is imposing a life’s will on to someone who doesn’t want that responsibility. After all, the TENS OF MILLIONS (if not HUNDREDS) is not all because of incest and rape.]
While some critics accused Planned Parenthood of selling aborted fetus parts, which would be illegal under federal law, the group says it only donates fetal tissue to researchers, for no profit.
But there may be other legal issues at play.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter Wednesday to Richards noting federal law prohibits the “alteration of abortion methods and procedures solely in order to obtain fetal tissue.”
Title IV of the Public Health Service Act says abortion providers cannot alter the “timing, method, or procedures” used to terminate a pregnancy solely for the purpose of obtaining tissue.
[my two cents: Yet another NORM brought to you be the democratic party]
[my two cents: You know what just dawned on me. No wonder the chief empty suit and most democrats do not see the exceptionalism of the United States. They are busy destroying the society of the country that once was exceptional. If you are busy legislating debauchery, murder and the such – how could you honestly believe or proclaim that America is exceptional?
We NEED an American Revolution!!! But I know it won’t happen.]
A lot of haters out there in the the “love-people” who are so “open-minded” when in ref to those against/unhappy with the Supreme Court’s decision last Friday.
I am glad Christians live under grace and not under the Law because no one can be saved and redeemed by the Law (Romans 2:12, 3:20-21; Galatians 2:21, 3:11 KJV: I can’t vouch for the other translations) (Sentence for those who want to quote the vast number of rules for the Jews in the OT.)
Disagreeing with the decision and with so-much of what is norm in society doesn’t (or at least shouldn’t) come with hate/venom and I hope what I wrote wasn’t misconstrued as such. I actually only had grief, concern and troubled-spirit when I wrote it. I am aware that a trick or SOP for the people referenced in the first sentence of this post is to call sincere objectors – haters. I can say/write I do not hate those who celebrate the decision on Friday. I do know – with certainty – it is all a spiritual battle.
“But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.”
(1 Corinthians 2:10-16 KJV) don’t
So yes proper judgement is expected of the Christian. As the old saying goes “We are to be fruit-inspectors”. And don’t forget “by their fruits you shall know them” (Matthew 7:20) – and btw, Jesus did say that.