Tag: politics
Social Security and its DNC history of pilfering

Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.
Up until the 1980’s, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the “NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION” message was removed.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible],
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent], and
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
AND MY FAVORITE:
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though. Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so — but it’s worth a try.
How many people can YOU send this to?
source thanks to @GlowSurfing
Controlled Disintegration
About a month ago, I became aware of an organization @PrometheanAction which has a YouTube channel that I highly recommend. The videos (that I watch) are about 15 minutes in length, well organized and excellent analysis. Also not bombarded with ads!
What they have been explaining over the past 3 weeks is what actually is occurring with the decisions of President Trump and Scott Bessent and their focus not only about Iran and the nuclear weapon but just as importantly the deliberate destroying of the monster system of the British Financial Empire that has wreaked havoc on all financial systems of the world.
But the real focus of this post is to share something that they referenced that I had not heard of that infuriated me the most. The term is “controlled disintegration”. I am providing an image of an article that succinctly explains what is, who was/is behind it. Learning of this and understanding what DJT’s administration has been doing with Economic Fury which is rolled up in the strategy and goals of Epic Fury.
Below the image is a link to a 16 minute video titled: IT WAS DELIBERATE: Rubio Exposes the 50-Year Plot

Friedman full bloom of TDS
Tom Friedman admits he prefers Iran win so Trump & Netanyahu won’t get the “win” for stabilizing the Middle East.
wake up!
At this point, what would it actually take to wake up the average MAGA voter?
Not the activist.
Not the terminally online.
I’m talking about “Mike”.
- Mid-40s to 60s
- Lived through Reagan, Clinton, Bush, Obama
- Voted Trump in 2016 and 2020
- Survived Biden’s disastrous term
- Now under Trump again
“Mike” isn’t stupid.
He’s seen cycles before.
His mindset is simple:
“I’ve lived through worse. We’ll be fine.”
That assumption is the danger.
Because what’s happening now isn’t a cycle.
The Left isn’t trying to win arguments anymore — they’re locking in structure:
- Courts
- Bureaucracy
- Agencies
- Election rules
- Demographics
Things that don’t swing back with one election.
“Mike” thinks: “Trump’s back. Damage control underway.”
But here’s the uncomfortable truth:
You can win elections and still lose the country.
Life doesn’t flip with tanks in the street.
It flips quietly:
- Rules change
- Enforcement becomes selective
- Rights become conditional
- Normal people become liabilities
By the time “Mike” says,
“Hold on… when did this happen?”
The system is already set.
So here’s the real issue:
“Mike” treats midterms like background noise.
The Left treats them like mission-critical infrastructure.
Midterms decide:
- Who blocks or enables Trump
- Who controls investigations
- Who funds agencies
- Who confirms judges
- Who writes the rules you live under
If “Mike” skips this one because “Trump’s got it,”
he’s handing the keys to people who don’t need the presidency to win.
The wake-up call isn’t panic.
It’s responsibility.
If “Mike” wants his kids to inherit a country that still resembles the one he grew up in,
he doesn’t just vote in presidential years — he shows up in the midterms.
That’s where countries are actually lost.
Voter ID requirements and the 2024 USA Presidential Election results
The most recent U.S. presidential election was held on November 5, 2024, between Republican Donald Trump (with running mate JD Vance) and Democrat Kamala Harris (with running mate Tim Walz). Donald Trump won the election, securing 312 electoral votes to Harris’s 226 (out of 538 total). There were no reported faithless electors.


en.wikipedia.org +1
Electoral Maps
commons.wikimedia.org
commons.wikimedia.org
(Standard red for Trump/Republican states, blue for Harris/Democratic states; the second map shades by margin of victory.)State-by-State Results Maine and Nebraska allocate electoral votes by congressional district (plus 2 statewide), resulting in splits. All other states award all electoral votes to the statewide winner. Data is final and certified.
en.wikipedia.org
| State/District | Winner | Electoral Votes | Trump % | Harris % | Margin |
| Alabama | Trump | 9 | 64.57% | 34.10% | +30.47% |
| Alaska | Trump | 3 | 54.54% | 41.41% | +13.13% |
| Arizona | Trump | 11 | 52.22% | 46.69% | +5.53% |
| Arkansas | Trump | 6 | 64.20% | 33.56% | +30.64% |
| California | Harris | 54 | 38.33% | 58.47% | +20.14% |
| Colorado | Harris | 10 | 43.14% | 54.13% | +10.99% |
| Connecticut | Harris | 7 | 41.89% | 56.40% | +14.51% |
| Delaware | Harris | 3 | 41.79% | 56.49% | +14.70% |
| District of Columbia | Harris | 3 | 6.47% | 90.28% | +83.81% |
| Florida | Trump | 30 | 56.09% | 42.99% | +13.10% |
| Georgia | Trump | 16 | 50.72% | 48.53% | +2.19% |
| Hawaii | Harris | 4 | 37.48% | 60.59% | +23.11% |
| Idaho | Trump | 4 | 66.87% | 30.38% | +36.49% |
| Illinois | Harris | 19 | 43.47% | 54.37% | +10.90% |
| Indiana | Trump | 11 | 58.58% | 39.62% | +18.96% |
| Iowa | Trump | 6 | 55.73% | 42.52% | +13.21% |
| Kansas | Trump | 6 | 57.16% | 41.04% | +16.12% |
| Kentucky | Trump | 8 | 64.47% | 33.94% | +30.53% |
| Louisiana | Trump | 8 | 60.22% | 38.21% | +22.01% |
| Maine (Statewide + CD1) | Harris | 3 | ~41% | ~56% | Harris overall |
| Maine CD2 | Trump | 1 | 53.50% | 44.46% | +9.05% |
| Maryland | Harris | 10 | 34.08% | 62.62% | +28.54% |
| Massachusetts | Harris | 11 | 36.02% | 61.22% | +25.20% |
| Michigan | Trump | 15 | 49.73% | 48.31% | +1.42% |
| Minnesota | Harris | 10 | 46.68% | 50.92% | +4.24% |
| Mississippi | Trump | 6 | 60.89% | 38.00% | +22.89% |
| Missouri | Trump | 10 | 58.49% | 40.08% | +18.41% |
| Montana | Trump | 4 | 58.39% | 38.46% | +19.93% |
| Nebraska (Statewide + CD1 + CD3) | Trump | 4 | ~63% | ~35% | Trump overall |
| Nebraska CD2 | Harris | 1 | 46.73% | 51.32% | +4.59% |
| Nevada | Trump | 6 | 50.59% | 47.49% | +3.10% |
| New Hampshire | Harris | 4 | 47.87% | 50.65% | +2.78% |
| New Jersey | Harris | 14 | 46.06% | 51.97% | +5.91% |
| New Mexico | Harris | 5 | 45.85% | 51.85% | +6.00% |
| New York | Harris | 28 | 43.31% | 55.91% | +12.60% |
| North Carolina | Trump | 16 | 50.86% | 47.65% | +3.21% |
| North Dakota | Trump | 3 | 66.96% | 30.51% | +36.45% |
| Ohio | Trump | 17 | 55.14% | 43.93% | +11.21% |
| Oklahoma | Trump | 7 | 66.16% | 31.90% | +34.26% |
| Oregon | Harris | 8 | 40.97% | 55.27% | +14.30% |
| Pennsylvania | Trump | 19 | 50.37% | 48.66% | +1.71% |
| Rhode Island | Harris | 4 | 41.76% | 55.54% | +13.78% |
| South Carolina | Trump | 9 | 58.23% | 40.36% | +17.87% |
| South Dakota | Trump | 3 | 63.43% | 34.24% | +29.19% |
| Tennessee | Trump | 11 | 64.19% | 34.47% | +29.72% |
| Texas | Trump | 40 | 56.14% | 42.46% | +13.68% |
| Utah | Trump | 6 | 59.38% | 37.79% | +21.59% |
| Vermont | Harris | 3 | 32.32% | 63.83% | +31.51% |
| Virginia | Harris | 13 | 46.05% | 51.83% | +5.78% |
| Washington | Harris | 12 | 39.01% | 57.23% | +18.22% |
| West Virginia | Trump | 4 | 69.97% | 28.10% | +41.87% |
| Wisconsin | Trump | 10 | 49.60% | 48.74% | +0.86% |
| Wyoming | Trump | 3 | 71.60% | 25.84% | +45.76% |
Trump won 31 states + ME-2 (total 312 EVs). Harris won 19 states + DC + NE-2 (total 226 EVs).
As of January 2026, voter ID requirements for in-person voting vary across US states. Reliable sources like the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) and the Movement Advancement Project (MAP) indicate that 36 states require or request some form of identification, while 14 states do not require any ID (voters are typically verified by signature or other information).States that DO NOT require any voter ID
- California
- Hawaii
- Illinois
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Minnesota
- Nevada
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Vermont
States that DO require some form of voter ID All other 36 states (requirements range from non-strict/non-photo ID to strict photo ID).Note: Laws are nuanced—”non-strict” means ID is requested but alternatives (like signing an affidavit) allow voting without it, while “strict” means no regular ballot without acceptable ID.For visual maps:
- Interactive color-coded map (current as of January 24, 2026, with detailed categories like strict photo ID, non-strict, etc.): https://www.lgbtmap.org/democracy-maps/in_person_voting
- NCSL overview and table: https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/voter-id
- Wikipedia summary with maps (as of late 2025): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_identification_laws_in_the_United_States
These sources provide the most up-to-date visualizations and details, as laws can have minor variations in classification.
