Utilitarianism and Politics

From Sen. Warner: Potential Policy Proposals for Regulation of Social Media and Technology Firms

The 23 page long white paper is based on the premise of the devastating impact of Russia on the 2016 election (gotta keep the lie/story/narrative) going is well summarized here at Reason.

Allow me to mention a point of his paper/reasoning: “Make platforms liable for state-law torts (defamation, false light, public disclosure of private facts) for failure to take down deep fake or other manipulated audio/video content.” May I ask, who determines fake? Well of course the “truth researchers” hired by the organization either out rightly or contracted. What will they use the left version of the bible of course, Snopes and the Southern Poverty Law Center of course. It is already occurring. The truth is deemed fake and the fake/lie is deemed truth. The organizations who are trying to share the truth are given “strikes”, “time out” and eventually de-platformed which is the IT/internet version of capital punishment.

The link I created above to the Southern Poverty Law Center will take you to the “hate map”. Do yourself and our country a favor and look over the list of organizations identified as hate groups. You will probably be surprised. (if you know how to import data, use the excel/csv export for a much faster way to scan the 950+ on the list). Let me mention a few,
Here is “anti-immigrant” which btw uses false-labeling (see below):

The left is aggressively doing all that they can, legal and illegal, constitutional and unconstitutional to prevent TRUTH being accessible to anyone who is looking or stumbles across it. Truth of course in reference to the LIES of not only the DNC but that of the radicalized liberal propaganda industrial complex, the MSM.

Michelle Malkin commented back in April 2018, “Media Matters has been at the forefront of the speech squelchers, who are highly organized, incredibly disciplined and obviously deeply funded, not only by George Soros but by a number of left-wing foundations.”

In the article Seven Techniques Liberals Use to Silence Conservatives Mr. Hawkins identified the following: “libspaining”, violence, de-platforming, PC/safe spaces/microaggressions, liberal fakes, false labeling and the ventriloquist dummy. And may I add, doxxing.

De-platforming is the most devastating, that is, if congress, VP Pence & President Trump continue to allow these unconstitutional activities to occur.  The left is using a combination of de-platforming and then RADICALIZED LIBERAL ACTIVISTS in the tech industry to attack conservative organizations via server attacks & aggressive pressure put on companies who are providing crucial IT services to cease providing the services which the company is under financial and legal contract to perform.

So why the title Utilitarianism and Politics? Simply, the radicalized liberal (which is becoming a redundant expression!) seems to pursue “the ends justifies the means”. It would seem that one can lie, engage in unconstitutional activity, practice violence and other means that are not part of a healthy vibrant society in order to get their way; since they are sure that their way is the right way. Mind, if a conservative tries to engage in peaceful discussion the seven techniques go into play. For example, if one is known to be an effective communicator of conservative principles then the left must immediately engage in any activity possible so as to remove any platform/location that the conservative would be invited or allowed to use.

Please go here to see the maintained list of substantiated acts of harassment & violence against supporters of President Trump by the left.

 

Letter to Legal Department of Microsoft

Hello, I am writing because I noticed a phrase in your soon to be official Code of Conduct that I believe needs to be properly defined.

vii. Don’t engage in activity that is harmful to you, the Services, or others (e.g., transmitting viruses, stalking, posting terrorist content, communicating hate speech, or advocating violence against others)…
b. Enforcement. If you violate these Terms, we may stop providing Services to you or we may close your Microsoft account. We may also block delivery of a communication (like email, file sharing or instant message) to or from the Services in an effort to enforce these Terms or we may remove or refuse to publish Your Content for any reason. When investigating alleged violations of these Terms, Microsoft reserves the right to review Your Content in order to resolve the issue. However, we cannot monitor the entire Services and make no attempt to do so.

 

My question is simple, what do you/Microsoft define as “hate speech”?

 

Such a vague reference, especially in this politically charged environment, is “scary”.

 

Regards,
Mailing 4/12/18

A sad anniversary

481 years ago yesterday William Tyndale was cruelly murder and burned at the stake. His crime? Translating the Bible into the language of the people of his country, English. The pope claimed he was a heretic after the charges made against him by Sir Thomas More, Bishop John Stokesley of London and King Henry VIII. Tyndale had to flee England but as he did, he kept working.

“In May 1535 he was betrayed by Henry Phillips as he left the house of Thomas Pontz. He was the merchant who had given him shelter in Antwerp. He was arrested and taken to Vilvorde castle near Brussels. There he was kept a prisoner for 18 months in the most wretched conditions. He was treated like a wicked murderer, when all he had done was translate the Bible into a readable language. During those 18 months, the authorities” such as Sir Thomas More archbishops and priests of the Roman Catholic church tried to make Tyndale say what he believed was wrong, and to say that it was untrue that man can reach salvation by Christ alone. But Tyndale refused to deny the truth, and said he would rather die and join his Lord in Heaven than deny his word and shame him. So in August 1536 they declared Tyndale a heretic and two months later he was killed by strangulation, then his corpse was burned in the city square.”

This is what happens when the Roman Catholic church has infiltrated governments and has the power to operate as it would like to. Things will be no different in the future. Look at the King James Bible( because the other versions are taken from the Greek Catholic text of Westcott and Hort which is the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus which change words and also omit them). Look in the Bible and read Revelation 13, 17 & 18. No it isn’t a parable. No it is not fiction. It is a warning.

William Tyndale, by creating the New Testament in English gave the reader the opportunity to read for themselves what Christ had done and said. They can read what Paul, Peter, Luke, Matthew, John, Mark, Jude had wrote. The reader could now plainly see for example in Hebrews that the mass was itself a heresy 4:12-5:14; 7; 8; 9; 10:1-18. Much of these text not in the Catholic documents. Or in 6:59-69 that when He said eat his flesh it was not literal but words explaining a spiritual truth.

The further result of simply translating the word of God into English? Those found with a copy were either beaten or killed – by the Roman Catholic church. The Roman Catholic church sought out and destroyed every copy they could gather.

William Tyndale gave his life so that the word of God was no longer bound and locked to  the “common” people. Before he was strangled he said, “Lord, open the king of England’s eyes.”

Since that day, Satan and the Roman Catholic church have been working hard to obscure the word of God, in essence removing from the people the word of God while giving them a “bible”. More on that in later posts.

I look forward to meeting Mr. Tyndale and telling him how much I appreciate what he did.

Google Manipulates Searches on Islam and Jihad

Google IS HELPING an organized disinformation campaign about the truths of the religion of Islam.

Source: Google Manipulates Searches on Islam and Jihad

2 cents:
Google, like Facebook, strive to inform the masses only that which is aligned to their “culturally elite” beliefs.
Wouldn’t it be great if all of the people who voted for President Trump, decided to no longer access/use the powerful organizations of the LEFT such as Google, Facebook and AMAZON.
Wouldn’t our unity against these organizations bring them down a few pegs? Wouldn’t our behavior based on our convictions detrimentally impact these moguls and their bottomline? 
What will it take to unify us who believe in the founding principles of our nation such as that of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? What will it take for us who believe in the 2nd Amendment to cease from purchasing from Amazon and/or to remove our “storefronts” from Amazon?
In my way of thinking, a conviction is only true/real if it is followed by the correct form of behavior. If it isn’t, aren’t we just convenient hypocrites?

President Trump and staff…

It is import to quit using the word “wire-tap” in reference to what OBAMA and his administration did in using government resources and agencies to listen and read conversations and correspondence in the Trump Plaza and elsewhere prior to the election.
Using the word wire-tap gives all those who are guilty a pass. Because they can CORRECTLY deny that it was ever done.
You need to use the correct vocabulary in describing the illegal and unethical work Obama and his administration did in breaching Mr. Trump and all his staff etc. privacy.