Tag: criminal behavior of the government

1.) Allow me to retort a thread to this specific account.

Everything claimed by this account, and any twitter account holder who advances the same prepositions as this account, are so brutally false and misguided it could only take an intentional effort to be this wrong.

 

2.) The investigative agents, those who most people put their faith upon, are hampered by compartmentalized isolation of evidence. The system is purposefully set up that way.

Evidence is essentially silo’d.

3.) Those who understand my efforts understand the objective when cast against the reality of silo’d and compartmentalized evidence.

4.) The DOJ team, which includes investigative units who transition evidence from investigative use into actionable DOJ assemblies, do not track successfully across known firewalls….

5.) The Durham probe (for lack of a more authentic descriptive) do not communicate w/The Hill.

Ex. HPSCI does not communicate w/Durham; at least they do not successfully communicate.

In part this is because the receiver would be accepting the political intents of the evidence.

6.) Politics creates a compartmented information flow.

Information, even valid evidence that would be useful for investigators, becomes useless when retrieved or originated from political entities.

6.) The result is actual Durham/Barr investigators do not know where most of the explosive evidence is located. This includes any documents that originate from inside this complemented process.

7.) As a result of this convoluted process; the Durham team knows little about any evidence their internal unit did not independently create.

This system design helps the compartmented and corrupt to escape accountability.

8.) Durham investigators therefore do not have a handle over the totality of evidence that exists in the public sphere; because the public evidence exists as extracted from numerous individual compartments – some of which they do not / cannot peer into.

9.) Previously both Senate and House staff admitted this was the fundamental flaw in their own investigations.

Additionally, this factual/structural flaw was confirmed to me today by the Durham investigative unit. [Read #8 Again]

10) Repeat: Durham investigators do not have a handle on the totality of evidence that exists in the public sphere; because the public evidence exists as extracted from numerous individual compartments – some of which they do not / cannot peer into.

11) When you understand that, you understand what I am doing.

I have extracted and collated evidence from inside each compartment; then assemble and deliver to the investigative unit in such a manner as the political toxicity is removed.

12.) Today they saw evidence for the first time that was never assembled. You would be stunned at what they do not know, because the institutional and political compartmentalization blocks the investigative use.

13.) There is no grand investigative plan. There is no bigger investigative design… because the quest to provenance evidence, the demanded process itself, must be self-originated.

14.) Example: judiciary.senate.gov/download/2018-…

Despite this coming from FISC to AG Barr and into Senate Judiciary Committee; Durham team unaware of the letter dated July 12, 2018.

15.) As a result… customary DOJ investigations can continue (ad infinitum) and yet will not result in substantive action prior to the election.

That’s where public questioning of investigative practices, and specific details, forces an investigative shift.