Retired Green Beret officer issues a WARNING!

On X

As a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops—both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations—I’ve seen organized resistance up close. From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.

What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t “protest.” It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook.

Signal groups at 1,000-member cap per zone. Dedicated roles: mobile chasers, plate checkers logging vehicle data into shared databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes vectoring assets, SALUTE-style reporting (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations and timed deletions to frustrate forensic recovery. Vetting processes for new joiners. Mutual aid from sympathetic locals (teachers providing cover, possible PD tip-offs on license plate lookups). Home-base coordination points. Rapid escalation from observation to physical obstruction—or worse.

This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a SF team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace “ICE agents” with “occupying coalition forces” and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s.

The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in. When your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid-response network against federal officers—complete with doxxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that’s already turned lethal—you’re no longer dealing with civil disobedience. You’re facing a distributed resistance that’s learned the lessons of successful insurgencies: stay below the kinetic threshold most of the time, force over-reaction when possible, maintain popular support through narrative, and never present a single center of gravity.

I spent years training partner forces to dismantle exactly this kind of apparatus. Now pieces of it are standing up in American cities, enabled by elements of local government and civil society. That should keep every thinking American awake at night.

Not because I want escalation. But because history shows these things don’t de-escalate on their own once the infrastructure exists and the cadre believe they’re winning the information war.

We either recognize what we’re actually looking at—or we pretend it’s still just “activism” until the structures harden and spread.

Your call, America. But from where I sit, this isn’t January 2026 politics anymore.
It’s phase one of something we’ve spent decades trying to keep off our own soil.
12:03 PM · Jan 25, 2026 15.7M Views

A reply from Emergent Perspective
@emergent

Excellent post.
Two things I’d like to add:
1) As the old WW2 bomber pilot saying goes “If you’re catching flak 💥, you’re over the target.” The enemy doesn’t employ this level of resources, unless there’s something to protect. There is a massive fraud and money laundering ring in Minneapolis, with ties to the Governor, his inner circle, and likely Democrat elites.
2) My mentor when I was in the military, was a retired LtCol who did 5 tours in Vietnam. He wrote much of the U.S. Army’s original COIN (Counterinsurgency) doctrine, from real experience on the ground, fighting the Viet Cong. What’s going on in Minnesota sounds just like his stories about that era. There were infiltration forces secretly running most of the towns in South Vietnam. You’d have a “legitimate,” above-ground government, that would greet the American forces, and pretend to be friendly. Then, you’d have the “shadow” government, hiding in the tunnels underneath the town, holding everybody else’s wives and children hostage, forcing them to play along. Those guys actually ran the show, hiding behind the “innocent” civilians, who they would TRY to get into conflict with our forces – it bolstered their recruiting efforts. It took a long time for U.S. forces to figure out what was really going on, and towards the end of the war, they started finding these guys and rooting them out, which wasn’t difficult once you knew their tactics and doctrine. But, it cost a lot of lives (and innocence) to learn those lessons. As terrifying as that is, this is what we are facing now, on our own soil. It’s going to be a trial by fire 🔥, no matter how it ends up.

15.7M Views

Implications of the hypocritical libtard philosophies

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2022/10/08/top-hospital-claims-children-can-know-their-trans-from-the-womb-n2614159

The people of death and hate (typically DNC/libtards) have revealed another libtard hypocrisy and implication of their lies (aka called “we have the science”).

The argument/LIE that a baby in the womb was not a living being but a mass/clump of cells — so as to provide them the excuse to kill the unwanted baby.

That same mass/clump of cells that is not a living human being does have the sense, knowledge and understanding from the womb to know what gender it wants to be — so as to provide them the excuse to perpetuate their will of further hate and death on the human life in yet another way.

Whether people want to own up to it or not, what we see repeatedly from the libtards/the radicalized left is the luciferian principle of attacking the human life form that is made in the image of God Almighty (Jehovah/the Lord Jesus Christ).

The motive behind the origin of the COV19 is climate change

from the Conservative Tree House:

Point One – The “Build Back Better” agenda (in every nation) was never about anything except radical climate change legislation.  Once you accept that baseline, things start to become much clearer.

Point Two – The “Build Back Better” phrase came from the World Economic Forum and was promoted by a multitude of international leaders and left-wing organizations.   That reality then brings up the most important point.  To get to “building back better”, you first need to destroy something.  That thing they needed to destroy was the global economic dependency on carbon-based fuel supplies (oil, gas, coal, etc.).

Point Three – In order to destroy the ‘something of that scale’, the energy program for the entire world, something massive is needed to fundamentally change the entire world approach toward energy production.  Something is needed to create the crisis that provides the origin for the process to initiate.

Point Four – That triggering mechanism was/is SARS-CoV-2, or what we now call COVID-19 and all variants therein.

There you have it.  That’s the summary soup to nuts explanation of why a virus was created, and the subsequent panic pushing to create social structures that would facilitate the global acceptance of an entire new economic system that would be designed around saving the planet.

Through the prism of that motive, all irreconcilable panic-selling from government entities starts to make sense.

You don’t have to be a true believer at the top of the climate change pyramid to see the massive financial opportunities created by an agenda to structurally change the entire foundation of energy use on a global scale.

Factually, I would be surprised if the biggest people within Klaus Schwab’s WEF believed in anything even resembling climate change. However, they would see the opportunity for a massive shift in global wealth, and with that comes a myriad of mechanisms and more opportunities to control it.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) was created to use the same fundamental associations of government and corporations.  Only this time it was the multinational corporations who organized to tell the government(s) what to do.  The WEF was organized for multinational corporations to assemble and tell the various governments how to cooperate with them, in order to be rewarded by them.   Corporatism was/is the outcome.  The government now doing what the multinationals tell them to do, and in return the multinationals install the compliant politicians

Fascism, the cooperation between government and corporations, is still the underlying premise; the World Economic Forum simply flipped the internal dynamic putting the corporations in charge of handing out the instructions.

What results is a slightly modified definition of fascism:

A massive multinational corporate conglomerate; telling a centralized autocratic government leader what to do; and using severe economic and social regimentation as a control mechanism; combined with forcible suppression of opposition by both the corporations and government.

Doesn’t that define our current reality, especially in the era of COVID?

The instructions from the multinationals to government would be called “Build Back Better”.

The triggering mechanism to create the crisis (BBB is designed to solve), is called SARS-CoV-2.

The program to control backlash and ensure sheeple compliance from various populations would be called “a vaccine.”

Driving fear of the Rona would be needed and disproportionate to the risk itself.   This keeps backlash in line (lockdowns, regulations etc).  If any opposition to the agenda begins to mount, the same people pushing the originating narrative then create and push a variant.  The variant, real or imagined, is then pushed forward in order to get compliance (acceptance of the BBB objective) back on track.

In my opinion, structurally changing the global economy around the threat of climate change is what this entire Coronavirus mess is all about.  They needed the virus to trigger the crisis.  The crisis then creates the roadmap to rebuilding all society -on a global level- away from fossil fuels.

Put another way: the motive behind the origin of the Coronavirus is climate change.

emphasis by me