The special investigator into ALL the CORRUPTION and TRAITOROUS activities William Aldenberg
or read below
1.) Allow me to retort a thread to this specific account.
Everything claimed by this account, and any twitter account holder who advances the same prepositions as this account, are so brutally false and misguided it could only take an intentional effort to be this wrong.
2.) The investigative agents, those who most people put their faith upon, are hampered by compartmentalized isolation of evidence. The system is purposefully set up that way.
Evidence is essentially silo’d.
5.) The Durham probe (for lack of a more authentic descriptive) do not communicate w/The Hill.
Ex. HPSCI does not communicate w/Durham; at least they do not successfully communicate.
In part this is because the receiver would be accepting the political intents of the evidence.
6.) Politics creates a compartmented information flow.
Information, even valid evidence that would be useful for investigators, becomes useless when retrieved or originated from political entities.
7.) As a result of this convoluted process; the Durham team knows little about any evidence their internal unit did not independently create.
This system design helps the compartmented and corrupt to escape accountability.
9.) Previously both Senate and House staff admitted this was the fundamental flaw in their own investigations.
Additionally, this factual/structural flaw was confirmed to me today by the Durham investigative unit. [Read #8 Again]
11) When you understand that, you understand what I am doing.
I have extracted and collated evidence from inside each compartment; then assemble and deliver to the investigative unit in such a manner as the political toxicity is removed.
14.) Example: judiciary.senate.gov/download/2018-…
Despite this coming from FISC to AG Barr and into Senate Judiciary Committee; Durham team unaware of the letter dated July 12, 2018.
15.) As a result… customary DOJ investigations can continue (ad infinitum) and yet will not result in substantive action prior to the election.
That’s where public questioning of investigative practices, and specific details, forces an investigative shift.
I have been following Mr. Binney since he first started providing intel and analysis on the Russiagate aka Seth Rich files. While what he provides here is drop the mic level analysis and WELL worth your ten minutes but I want to zero on what I consider a buried lead in the story.
[Binney] “summarizing why he is convinced that the CIA (under President Barack Obama) did this frame-up against Russia, ‘Russiagate’ — it’s a case that he is seeking to present to Congress, and in court, and to debate in public, instead of to continue to be hidden from the public; he wants to show, and publicly to debate, this evidence, so that the public will be able to see it, and evaluate it, for themselves:”
I have long believed the CIA needs to be dismantled. Most of the time they are a rogue organization. Often (understatement) their actions have led to other nations hatred of our country, provided the illegal drugs to our citizens and had their hands in assassinations (MURDER) of leadership and other people in our own country and in other countries. [[What in this last sentence sounds like what the founding fathers had in mind for the USA?!!]] By the way if the fingerprints point to CIA and Seth Rich is murdered, whom would u say murdered Seth Rich?
My question to Congress, those whom are called republican in reality (many are just RINOs), why haven’t u called for Mr. Binney to speak to Congress about this matter and OTHER MATTERS Mr. Binney knows very well of? Don’t say because the house is under dem leadership because the first two years it was under republican leadership (thereby proving the case that they were indeed RINOs/never-Trumpers). Senate? Republican leadership? Never-Trumper? RINOs? What does the evidence show? RINOs and Never-Trumpers! [Graham BFF McCain which was a never-Trumper]. [Interesting history study: McCain and ISIS]
President Trump why don’t YOU invite Mr. Binney in for something positioned like a discussion that allows you and him to get this whole matter into the households across our country? You know how to outsmart the MSM and the radicalized liberal democrats.
But I digress…