Whitney is usually accurate but she blows it with her analysis of dispensationalism and no scriptural ref for the rapture. In ref to the rapture, the accurate term is the translation of the saints or the translation of the body of Christ. The translation first occurrence in scripture is when Enoch was translated by God and taken up with him. (Hebrews 11:5 and Genesis 5:24.) The doctrine of the translation of the body of Christ is taught in that those who are born again and thereby in the body of Christ will not suffer the wrath of God. (1 Thess 5:9;1 Thess 1:10; Romans 5:9) Wrath being in at least two instances: 1) the eternal wrath of God on the wicked 2) the wrath of God on those who rejected His Son the Lord Jesus Christ and chose to not believe God and His word about all the matters. The period of wrath the ends with the great tribulation. (1 Thess 4:13-18; 1 Thess 5:1-11; 2 Thess 1:7-12; 2 Thess 2:1-12.)
In type or symbolism, their are instances of the event of the translation/rapture of the body of Christ for example in the NT the apostle John has been understood by many students of the Bible as a “type” of the church/the body of Christ because of his continued ref to himself as the one whom Jesus loved (John 13:23, 19:26, 20:2, 21:7 & 20) (Christ loved the church: Eph 5:2, 25, 32). In the book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ, the first 3 chapters of the book we read over and over of the presence, actions and Jesus’ analysis of the churches in Asia Minor. With this understanding in chapter 4 verse 1 John is immediately taken/translated from the earth and is in Heaven witnessing the future events and during this time we see no further references to the church as the events of the tribulation and great tribulation are rolled out on the earth and recorded for the reader. The church is gone from the earth = the body of Christ is gone from the earth. Why? It was taken up/translated/raptured. So yes their is plenty of evidence of the doctrine of the translation/rapture of the body of Christ.
BTW, sadly this post was needed because the poster of the video TFTC removed not only the short comment (see above) but also my reply to a commenter where I simply wrote, “I agree see my comment”.
Hope, Levity and Wonder 