No, its not a cause for optimism

In the Federalist article: Democracy dies in the darkness when the media avoids extremists

Is an interesting article to read. My reason though for writing about it is the apparent sugar pill given at the end that may give the idea that not all things are reallly foul.

The second to last paragraph is:
“The common thread connecting these stories and others is the establishment media’s extreme reluctance to expose left-wing extremism, especially among elected Democrats or progressive leadership. If you are inclined toward optimism, you might conclude that at least the left’s late-term abortion and anti-Semitic factions are recognized by the media as sufficiently repellent that they cannot be covered neutrally or fairly without damaging the party. That is a very small silver lining to a very large, dark cloud.”

My 2 cents:
The reason they are not covering the radicalized liberal democrats/progressive leadership is because MSM does not want to provide more material as proof, to conservatives or others who appreciate and care about the well-being of our country, that the HEART of the democrats/progressives is TOXIC, MALEVOLENT and DESTRUCTIVE to our country and ALL OF THOSE WHO OPPOSE THEIR PHILOSOPHY, PRINCIPLES AND BEHAVIOR.

No silver lining there. MSM has and will continue to be complicit in the destruction and ruin of the USA.

2 cents on the madness

  1. The radicalized left which of course includes the MSM is saying that the young man wearing the red MAGA hat is at fault because he wore the red hat. That the red hat is akin to the white hoods of the KKK. That the red hat triggers a lot of people and because of that he should not be wearing it.   He wore it, his bad, his fault. Think a moment what that means. A liberal can wear Bernie, BHO or whatever – it is their right. And it is also their right to get in your face if u choose to wear your red MAGA hat. So in either instance, the liberal/left/radicalized individual is right. AS a conservative, u must deal with what they wear AND not wear what u want if the radicalized left doesn’t approve of it. Also – think about it – what else does it say? They say Sandman is at fault because he wore the red hat. Because of what he wore. Sound familiar? A lady wears a sexy outfit and gets raped; now using their flawed reasoning – it is her fault. She should know better. Her sexy outfit was going to trigger a rape response in some man. This all showing yet again, the radicalized left is unable to perform accurate, sound critical thinking.  This all showing the hypocrisy in their words and behavior.
  2. I think I have figured something out. We have video recordings of chuckie, nancy, etc. waxing eloquent over last 10-12 years that “yep we need a wall and better security on the borders”. Chief empty suit spoke the same rhetoric. They all pumped up their chests and beating them like Tarzan as a way to look tough. Mind u the issue wasn’t handled. But now, the opposite is occurring; is it JUST their hate of President Trump? I no longer think so. I think they lied all those years but knew they could “flex their muscles” (LIE) since they were in control. They never honestly intended to solve the problem because of among other reasons, the illegal votes they need to keep in power. They lied/spinned their rhetoric for fake news to broadcast around the world. President Trump in office and wants to deal with it fully has exposed to the world that chuckie, nancy, etc. were LIARS.

A lesson on despicable

Another real and sad example of the despicable behavior of the radicalized liberal democrats.

“Despicable is deserving to be despised; so worthless &/or obnoxious as to rouse moral indignation.” [Merriam-Webster dictionary]

What can we do to prove that we believe and understand them to be so very despicable?