Tag: HYPOCRITES OF MSM AND DEM PARTY

Modernity and the breakaway free-fall of western civilization in our time

This is a little over 14 minutes long.
It is uncomfortable to view and troubling to see how PLAINLY that our society is not going to get better.
The video is also an accurate summary of how society is nearing the prophetical end of the Lord Jesus Christ’s words:

Luke 17:25-29  But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of this generation.  [26]  And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man.  [27]  They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.  [28]  Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded;  [29]  But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.

What was the impact to Lot for being there is the land of Sodom and Gomorrah?  2 Peter 2:4-9  For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;  [5]  And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;  [6]  And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;  [7]  And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:  [8]  (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)  [9]  The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:

 

icubudLeave a comment

More proof Mueller and his investigation was corrupt and unethical

LINK

Alan M. Dershowitz is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School.

“The Mueller report says that attorney John Dowd reached out to Robert Kelner, Gen. Michael Flynn’s lawyer, after Flynn withdrew from a joint defense agreement with the Trump legal team and asked Kelner to give him a “heads up.” The report characterized the voicemail message as an attempt by the president’s counsel to obstruct Flynn’s cooperation with the Mueller probe, and that’s also how much of the press reported on it.

Here’s what the report said: “On November 22, 2017” — after Flynn withdrew from the joint defense agreement he had with President Trump — “… the President’s personal counsel left a voicemail for Flynn’s counsel that said: ‘I understand your situation, but let me see if I can’t state it in starker terms … [I]t wouldn’t surprise me if you’ve gone on to make a deal with … the government … [I]f … there’s information that implicates the President, then we’ve got a national security issue … so, you know … we need some kind of heads up. Umn, just for the sake of protecting all our interests if we can … [R]emember what we’ve always said about the President and his feelings toward Flynn and, that still remains …”  (Mueller Report, Vol. 2, p. 121-122)

Only after Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered the government to release a full transcript of the voicemail message did it become clear that the report mischaracterized Dowd’s voicemail message.

The full message, that does not appear in the report, was as follows:  “Hey, Rob, uhm, this is John again. Uh, maybe, I-I-I-’m-I’m sympathetic; I understand your situation, but let me see if I can’t … state it in … starker terms. If you have … and it wouldn’t surprise me if you’ve gone on to make a deal with, and, uh, work with the government, uh … I understand that you can’t join the joint defense; so that’s one thing. If, on the other hand, we have, there’s information that … implicates the president, then we’ve got a national security issue, or maybe a national security issue, I don’t know … some issue, we got to — we got to deal with, not only for the president, but for the country. So … uh … you know, then, then, you know, we need some kind of heads up. Um, just for the sake of … protecting all our interests, if we can, without you having to give up any … confidential information. So, uhm, and if it’s the former, then, you know, remember what we’ve always said about the President and his feelings toward Flynn and, that still remains, but — Well, in any event, uhm, let me know, and, uh, I appreciate your listening and taking the time. Thanks, pal.”

The edited version released by the special prosecutor omits the following important words: “I’m sympathetic … I understand that you can’t join the joint defense; so that’s one thing. If, on the other hand, we have maybe a national security issue … some issue, we got to — we got to deal with, not only for the President, but for the country … without you having to give up any … confidential information.”

The Department of Justice claims that the full transcript is consistent with the overall incident. Dowd disagrees, pointing out that by “taking out half my words, they changed the tenor and the contents of that conversation with Robert Kelner… Isn’t it ironic that this man who kept indicting and prosecuting people for process crimes committed a false statement in his own report.”

Dowd’s request was not only entirely proper for a president’s counsel to make, but obligatory for any defense attorney properly seeking information necessary to his defense. By editing the transcript to fit their narrative, the Mueller team distorted the facts. If an ordinary lawyer or prosecutor were to provide a quotation in a court submission that omitted words that undercut his argument, he would be subject to discipline.

The public must be told who approved the decision to remove important words from the Dowd quotation, and for what reason. Did Mueller approve the cuts? Did the person who made the cuts inform his superiors precisely what he was omitting and why? Even more than ordinary prosecutors, Mueller and his team have a special obligation not to engage in this kind of selective editing. Their report is, by its nature, one-sided. The public needs to trust what the special prosecutor says in his report.

icubudLeave a comment

Rotten fruit from a rotten tree

Look around today and you will see the results of philosophies that are anti-God, anti-Christian, anti-civility, anti-human, anti-USA and are pro-hate, pro-debauchery, pro-luciferianism, pro-death, pro-immorality, pro-amorality and pro-hedonism.

This large shift in the USA took a lot of hard work and capital from individuals and organizations who can not stand for a nation, state, community and especially the home, that did not correctly enforce and propagate their beliefs over the “sheeple”, “chattel”, “riff raff” and “deplorables”.

I experience fear and anxiety when I think what lies ahead for this country 20 years from now. I will probably be at the point of stepping out of this plain of existence and into the next. But what about all the lives still “here” and having to endure their physical existence?

I came across a couple of articles by the writer/journalist Tabitha Korol that I am going to share below.

GRAND THEFT OF OUR CHILDREN – WESTERN CIVILIZATION IS THE BLAME

GOOD MORNING LIL KOMRADES – THE END OF BEST FRIENDS

icubudLeave a comment

It is one or the other

It’s little wonder why 77 percent of Americans across the political spectrum disapprove of Congress’ job performance, according to the latest survey from Gallup.
On January 3, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) took over as Speaker of the House for the second time in her career. In the four and a half months since, Americans have gotten another close look at what career politicians do best: anything but solve real problems.
For more than two years, Congressional Democrats excused inaction by attacking President Donald J. Trump every day for a crime he did not commit. The Mueller Report—a 400-page document that cost American taxpayers at least $35 million—recommended no charges against the President. That should have ended the matter.
Americans Don’t Want Impeachment, but Democrats Aren’t Listening
-Fox News
“The American people are sending a pretty clear message to Washington: They are sick and tired of the investigations into President Trump and don’t want Democrats in Congress to impeach him,” Marc Thiessen of the American Enterprise Institute writes. “A Harvard-Harris poll finds that 65 percent of Americans say Congress should not begin impeachment proceedings against Trump . . . And 58 percent believe that ‘Given the Mueller report … we should turn the page on investigations of President Trump.’”
Pelosi, Dems Just Don’t Care About Our National Emergency
-Fox News
“Now in the majority with control over the House floor, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her conference are poised to let funding for the Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) program run out . . . First, Pelosi and Democrats denied the existence of the national emergency. Now, they are willing to let federal agencies run out of money to care for migrant children,” Reps. Chip Roy (R-TX), Andy Biggs (R-AZ), Jim Jordan (R-OH) write.

2 cents:

The issue is not just Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Waters and their fellow RADICALIZED LIBERAL DEMOCRATS…

Quite possibly the biggest issue is that there are individuals who in majority voting continue to put these anti-USA political hacks in office.

OR, maybe yet, the biggest issue is that their constituents are not re-electing them, but they are STEALING THE LOCAL ELECTIONS.

IT IS ONE OR THE OTHER.

icubudLeave a comment

Note as well what isn’t in the report…

“Mr. Mueller may not care. His report suggests the actual goal of the obstruction volume is impeachment: “We concluded that Congress has the authority to prohibit a President’s corrupt use of his authority.”

Note as well what isn’t in the report. It makes only passing, bland references to the genesis of so many of the accusations Mr. Mueller probed: the infamous dossier produced by opposition-research firm Fusion GPS and paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign. How do you exonerate Mr. Page without delving into the scandalous Moscow deeds of which he was falsely accused? How do you narrate an entire section on the July 2016 Trump Tower meeting without noting that Ms. Veselnitskaya was working alongside Fusion? How do you detail every aspect of the Papadopoulos accusations while avoiding any detail of the curious and suspect ways that those accusations came back to the FBI via Australia’s Alexander Downer?

The report instead mostly reads as a lengthy defense of the FBI.”

The above analysis is from Kim Strassel’s post “Mueller’s report speaks volumes” that I located at instapundit.

Emphasis added by me

icubudLeave a comment