Why would Microsoft not be willing to be transparent about what they consider as “hate speech”?
My letter
Mailed on April 12, 2018
Mailed on April 12, 2018
Huh?
Click the link for the feud story:
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2018/06/08/Trump-to-leave-G7-summit-early-amid-feud-with-Trudeau-Macron/6801528453387/
Get the story and note the title:
![]()
Wait? What happened to the feud?
Well folks, NO SURPRISE HERE: No feud…
Check at the below the halfway down point of the story:

But you see, the average liberal won’t read the story, just the web search or the title. Maybe they will quick scan the article looking for hate fodder = talking points of MSM.
No, FAKE NEWS doesn’t happen.
Gee, I wonder how many organizations will pick up that false story.
Why is Mueller working “so hard” and behaving unprofessionally and unbecoming?
Please don’t be so quick to answer the question, give me a few seconds of your time.
Is his actions and behavior simply SOP that we can trace throughout his political-law enforcement career?
Or could it be that he has been threatened with publicizing some activity/activities that were undoubtedly illegal if he fails to do what HRC/WJC/TCF and her/their globalist peers want accomplished: the take down of President Trump?
Maybe its the second and he is employing his SOP.
Just a thought.
Dated May 22, 2018
Its heading shows:
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Attorney General of the United States should appoint a Special Counsel to investigate misconduct at the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation, including an investigation of abuse of the FISA warrant process, how and why the Hillary Clinton probe ended, and how and why the Donald Trump-Russia probe began.
2 cents:
What follows is something around 57 “whereas” clauses which state like bullet-points what Congress KNOWS has transpired.
The document is 12 pages due to formatting. I think it would normally fit on around five pages. It takes about ten minutes to read.
Now, I think it is well and good BUT I have significant concern with this phrase: “… that the Attorney General of the United States should appoint…”. Considering that Mr. Sessions has recused himself from the Russia probe (aka witch hunt/an attempt (still ongoing) of a coup of the duly elected President of the USA), I suspect mister dirty-hands (aka R. Rosenstein) will be the one who would appoint a second special counsel – and that IS A HORRIBLE MISTAKE.
So what can the House legally recommend instead? Is there a legal way for the House of Representatives to “tap” someone specifically for the work?
@Jim_Jordan
@DevinNunes
@replouiegohmert
@marklevinshow
@seanhannity
@SaraCarterDC
@IngrahamAngle
@5strat
@tracybeanz
@AnnCoulter
@LisaMei62
@jerome_corsi
@judicialwatch
@EdithRamirezFTC @MOhlhausenFTC @SaraCarterDC @IngrahamAngle @LouDobbs @RealJamesWoods
@TMcSweenyFTC @MarshaBlackburn @CNN @FoxNews @marklevinshow @5Strat @chuckwoolery @tracybeanz
@POTUS @TGowdySC @realDonaldTrump
President Trump’s letter to Kim Jong Un
Very well done.
Great example of diplomacy, negotiation and the “art of the deal”
