She gets away with it…

From Sheryl Attkinsson;

The following is an excerpt from a story first published in The Daily Signal in 2014. According to officials, no law enforcement ever followed up on the report of alleged obstruction.

As the House Select Committee on Benghazi prepares for its first hearing this week, a former State Department diplomat is coming forward with a startling allegation: Hillary Clinton confidants were part of an operation to “separate” damaging documents before they were turned over to the Accountability Review Board investigating security lapses surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya.

According to former Deputy Assistant Secretary Raymond Maxwell, the after-hours session took place over a weekend in a basement operations-type center at State Department headquarters in Washington, D.C. This is the first time Maxwell has publicly come forward with the story.

At the time, Maxwell was a leader in the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, which was charged with collecting emails and documents relevant to the Benghazi probe.

“I was not invited to that after-hours endeavor, but I heard about it and decided to check it out on a Sunday afternoon,” Maxwell says.

He didn’t know it then, but Maxwell would ultimately become one of four State Department officials singled out for discipline—he says scapegoated—then later cleared for devastating security lapses leading up to the attacks. Four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, were murdered during the Benghazi attacks.

You can continue reading the story by clicking this link: https://www.dailysignal.com/2014/09/15/benghazi-bombshell-clinton-state-department-official-reveals-alleged-details-document-review/

More proof…

The same networks that spent 2,202 minutes of collective airtime to push the Russia Collusion Media-Hoax are refusing to cover the Senate Intelligence Committee bipartisan report, which found no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The Media Research Center (MRC) did the research and found that between January 21, 2017, and February 10, 2019, “ABC’s World News Tonight, the CBS Evening News, and the NBC Nightly News [spent] 2,202 minutes on the Russia investigation [, which] accounted for nearly 19 percent of all Trump-related reporting [, and now] none of those three shows have even mentioned the investigation since NBC’s report came out on February 12.”

The same is true elsewhere on the left-wing networks.

“Neither CBS This Morning nor NBC’s Today have even acknowledged this new information from Senate investigators since the news broke on February 12,” MRC reports. “ABC’s Good Morning America briefly touched on it in a news brief totaling less than one minute on February 13.”

What’s especially fascinating is that NBC’s Ken Dilanian broke the original news of the Senate report, and NBC is still refusing to cover the story.

The reasons for this are quite obvious: the media know a reckoning is on the horizon, and they are buying time in the hopes of finding a way to wriggle out of it.

The rest of the Breitbart story here.

How is MSM lying to u today?

No, its not a cause for optimism

In the Federalist article: Democracy dies in the darkness when the media avoids extremists

Is an interesting article to read. My reason though for writing about it is the apparent sugar pill given at the end that may give the idea that not all things are reallly foul.

The second to last paragraph is:
“The common thread connecting these stories and others is the establishment media’s extreme reluctance to expose left-wing extremism, especially among elected Democrats or progressive leadership. If you are inclined toward optimism, you might conclude that at least the left’s late-term abortion and anti-Semitic factions are recognized by the media as sufficiently repellent that they cannot be covered neutrally or fairly without damaging the party. That is a very small silver lining to a very large, dark cloud.”

My 2 cents:
The reason they are not covering the radicalized liberal democrats/progressive leadership is because MSM does not want to provide more material as proof, to conservatives or others who appreciate and care about the well-being of our country, that the HEART of the democrats/progressives is TOXIC, MALEVOLENT and DESTRUCTIVE to our country and ALL OF THOSE WHO OPPOSE THEIR PHILOSOPHY, PRINCIPLES AND BEHAVIOR.

No silver lining there. MSM has and will continue to be complicit in the destruction and ruin of the USA.

A lesson on despicable

Another real and sad example of the despicable behavior of the radicalized liberal democrats.

“Despicable is deserving to be despised; so worthless &/or obnoxious as to rouse moral indignation.” [Merriam-Webster dictionary]

What can we do to prove that we believe and understand them to be so very despicable?