— Bodhi Crane (@BodhiCrane) September 16, 2020
I have been following Mr. Binney since he first started providing intel and analysis on the Russiagate aka Seth Rich files. While what he provides here is drop the mic level analysis and WELL worth your ten minutes but I want to zero on what I consider a buried lead in the story.
[Binney] “summarizing why he is convinced that the CIA (under President Barack Obama) did this frame-up against Russia, ‘Russiagate’ — it’s a case that he is seeking to present to Congress, and in court, and to debate in public, instead of to continue to be hidden from the public; he wants to show, and publicly to debate, this evidence, so that the public will be able to see it, and evaluate it, for themselves:”
I have long believed the CIA needs to be dismantled. Most of the time they are a rogue organization. Often (understatement) their actions have led to other nations hatred of our country, provided the illegal drugs to our citizens and had their hands in assassinations (MURDER) of leadership and other people in our own country and in other countries. [[What in this last sentence sounds like what the founding fathers had in mind for the USA?!!]] By the way if the fingerprints point to CIA and Seth Rich is murdered, whom would u say murdered Seth Rich?
My question to Congress, those whom are called republican in reality (many are just RINOs), why haven’t u called for Mr. Binney to speak to Congress about this matter and OTHER MATTERS Mr. Binney knows very well of? Don’t say because the house is under dem leadership because the first two years it was under republican leadership (thereby proving the case that they were indeed RINOs/never-Trumpers). Senate? Republican leadership? Never-Trumper? RINOs? What does the evidence show? RINOs and Never-Trumpers! [Graham BFF McCain which was a never-Trumper]. [Interesting history study: McCain and ISIS]
President Trump why don’t YOU invite Mr. Binney in for something positioned like a discussion that allows you and him to get this whole matter into the households across our country? You know how to outsmart the MSM and the radicalized liberal democrats.
But I digress…
The same networks that spent 2,202 minutes of collective airtime to push the Russia Collusion Media-Hoax are refusing to cover the Senate Intelligence Committee bipartisan report, which found no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
The Media Research Center (MRC) did the research and found that between January 21, 2017, and February 10, 2019, “ABC’s World News Tonight, the CBS Evening News, and the NBC Nightly News [spent] 2,202 minutes on the Russia investigation [, which] accounted for nearly 19 percent of all Trump-related reporting [, and now] none of those three shows have even mentioned the investigation since NBC’s report came out on February 12.”
The same is true elsewhere on the left-wing networks.
“Neither CBS This Morning nor NBC’s Today have even acknowledged this new information from Senate investigators since the news broke on February 12,” MRC reports. “ABC’s Good Morning America briefly touched on it in a news brief totaling less than one minute on February 13.”
What’s especially fascinating is that NBC’s Ken Dilanian broke the original news of the Senate report, and NBC is still refusing to cover the story.
The reasons for this are quite obvious: the media know a reckoning is on the horizon, and they are buying time in the hopes of finding a way to wriggle out of it.
How is MSM lying to u today?
The ineptitude of Obama paved the way for Putin to act in the Ukraine.
This will be interesting to watch as it unfolds.
Ukraine’s interim prime minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk needs to speak with eastern European countries such as Poland about the willingness and integrity of Obama and his administration. Ukraine needs to use EU allies such as Merkel to broker a draw down of escalation and the actual removal of troops from Crimea. Putin is a chess player and I am certain that his posturing with Crimea is to get the Ukrainian government to keep the ties with Russia and be part of the bloc as the previous Russian crony had decided. Yatsenyuk needs to be cautious with his words and urgent admonition that Ukraine is looking westward and that is where it will go. He needs to focus on the matter about his country and Russia and put that matter to the side. It may be quite possible once he talks with Putin to identify a third option that will allow both sides to get what they want.
But still — bottom-line —- For the sake of the Ukrainians, Yatsenyuk do not rely on Obama.