The judges in the USA have the responsibility of interpreting the laws of our country according to the words of the law. They are not supposed to apply their own political, social and/or moral philosophies to the laws of our country. The judge is supposed to be a neutral and non-partisan expert in the laws and the legal connections that they make.
“Schumer pronounced judgment on Gorsuch, saying that while the judge met all the legal qualifications, he wasn’t the liberal judge Republicans prevented President Obama from nominating in his final year. “Judge Gorsuch was unable to sufficiently convince me that he’d be an independent check on a president who has shown almost no restraint from executive overreach,” Schumer said. “Second, he was unable to convince me that he would be a mainstream justice who could rule free from the biases of politics and ideology.”
Why would a judge be liberal? Wouldn’t that make him a poor judge? Wouldn’t that mean the judge was unethical? Schumer and the democrats only want a judge that aligns to their anti-USA policies and practices. They want a judge that doesn’t agree with Trump. They are not after the fair and judicial equality as promised in our Constitution, Bill of Rights and so on. They want an UNETHICAL AND LIBERAL ACTIVIST JUDGE.
Hope, Levity and Wonder 
Published by