FISA Court Complicit?

Justice Watch article

“It is disturbing that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance courts rubber-stamped the Carter Page spy warrants and held not one hearing on these extraordinary requests to spy on the Trump team,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

Yes, you read that correctly. The FISA court, which is a very special and secretive court, willingly rubber stamped each request of surveillance of Carter Page.

National Security Division] FOIA consulted [Office of Intelligence] … to identify and locate records responsive to [Judicial Watch’s] FOIA request…. [Office of Intelligence] determined … that there were no records, electronic or paper, responsive to [Judicial Watch’s] FOIA request with regard to Carter Page. [Office of Intelligence] further confirmed that the [Foreign Surveillance Court] considered the Page warrant applications based upon written submissions and did not hold any hearings.

One of the reasons for the FISA court is to insure the protection of the rights of USA citizens and yet they have a process which a judge can quickly (and apparently repeatedly) approve surveillance of USA citizens without attempting to follow due diligence.

My question is simple, is FISA broken or corrupt?

A couple of lessons from Q

[Cause]

Define ‘Subversion’.

The act of subverting : the state of being subverted; especially : a systematic attempt to overthrow or undermine a government or political system by persons working secretly from within?

[Effect]

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

“The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.”

“I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.”

NATIONAL EMERGENCY.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2018-amendments-manual-courts-martial-united-states/

January 1, 2019

“Sec. 12. In accordance with Article 33 of the UCMJ, as amended by section 5204 of the MJA, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, will issue nonbinding guidance regarding factors that commanders, convening authorities, staff judge advocates, and judge advocates should take into account when exercising their duties with respect to the disposition of charges and specifications in the interest of justice and discipline under Articles 30 and 34 of the UCMJ. That guidance will take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Federal Government with respect to the disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law.”

+ FBI personnel removal

+ DOJ personnel removal

+ C_A personnel removal

+ State personnel removal

+ WH personnel removal

+ House personnel removal

+ Senate personnel removal

+ Chair/CEO/VP removal

+ MIL budget (largest in our history).

+ MIL presence around POTUS

+ 45,000 sealed indictments

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/03/28/when-it-comes-guantanamo-trump-truly-builder-chief.html

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/23/trump-revives-private-prison-program-doj-obama-administration-end

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

Nothing to See Here.

Q

WWG1WGA

Quick question

Why is Mueller working “so hard” and behaving unprofessionally and unbecoming?
Please don’t be so quick to answer the question, give me a few seconds of your time.

Is his actions and behavior simply SOP that we can trace throughout his political-law enforcement career?
Or could it be that he has been threatened with publicizing some activity/activities that were undoubtedly illegal if he fails to do what HRC/WJC/TCF and her/their globalist peers want accomplished: the take down of President Trump?

Maybe its the second and he is employing his SOP.

Just a thought.

President Trump and staff…

It is import to quit using the word “wire-tap” in reference to what OBAMA and his administration did in using government resources and agencies to listen and read conversations and correspondence in the Trump Plaza and elsewhere prior to the election.
Using the word wire-tap gives all those who are guilty a pass. Because they can CORRECTLY deny that it was ever done.
You need to use the correct vocabulary in describing the illegal and unethical work Obama and his administration did in breaching Mr. Trump and all his staff etc. privacy.

 

 

State Department continues to drag its feet in action to assistance Hillary election bid

Attached and referenced below is from the JUDICIAL WATCH. Its a bit longer of an article, maybe 15 minutes at the most. However it does provide a good synopsis of the matter and what unethical behavior the State Department and others are doing in order to protect Hillary and undoubtedly Bill Clinton.

Excerpt from Judicial Watch:

The State Department admitted that it has 5,600 Clinton emails recovered by the FBI that were government documents and not personal emails as she claimed. The public deserves to know what is in those emails, well before November 8, and the State Department should not continue dragging its feet on producing them.  The State Department admitted in court today it pulled staff off of Clinton email Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. The American people need to pressure State to stop sitting on these new Clinton emails for political reasons and release them as the law requires.  It is outrageous the State Department has had these new Clinton emails since late July, but has only released 5 records.
The court ordered State to process the first 350 pages of documents by October 7, the second 350 pages by October 21, and the third by November 4.  (The State Department claims a substantial number of the Clinton emails may be duplicative or near-duplicative of emails Hillary Clinton previously turned over to the State Department.)
The Wall Street Journal reported our reaction right after this morning’s hearing:
After the judge’s order, Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said that “the American people could be deprived of this information at this essential time.”
“This is an absolutely corrupt process the State Department has come up with,” he said, blaming the department for the continuing delays.

hqdefault

I spent a lot of time marking up the article in Word only to lose all the mark-ups when pasting into WordPress. So I have attached the article as a PDF.

state-department-ordered-to-disclose-emails