Tag: philosophy

To what degree will conservatives allow themselves to be punished for their political opinions?

Payment processor PayPal has banned Infowars in what represents nothing less than a

political ploy designed to financially sabotage an influential media outlet just weeks

before the mid-term elections.

Will it get to the stage where conservatives are banned from having bank accounts or

making credit purchases because of their personal beliefs? This is absolutely chilling.

The ban represents nothing less than politically motivated financial discrimination by a giant corporation abusing its monopolistic status to attack the basic right to engage in commerce.

PayPal still offers its services to all kinds of unsavory groups and organizations, including groups linked to

Palestinian terrorists and extremists like Louis Farrakhan. Why aren’t they banned? Who decides what constitutes

“hate”?

Infowars was also tipped off by sources in DC that payment processors would be the next target, with Infowars being the first victim, after which leftists would attempt to bring down the NRA and more mainstream conservative groups.

Just as Wikileaks’ ability to process payments was sabotaged after it angered the deep state, the financial attack on Infowars is being orchestrated by ‘resistance’ holdovers who are still in government positions.

Other prominent conservatives and political groups must realize that while this is happening to Infowars today, they are next.

This is election meddling writ large. This is giant corporations taking their orders from the deep state and mobs of leftists and then destroying people’s livelihoods by restricting their access to the marketplace.

This is why it is imperative that President Trump pass an executive order that offers protection for conservatives whose rights are being violated on a regular basis by Big Tech monopolies.

With PayPal now buying up global credit card payment processors, Trump must surely look at blocking such activity under anti-trust laws.

This sets off a horrific domino effect and an awful precedent for free speech and freedom of commerce.

Whole article here

icubudLeave a comment

Inept or deliberately committed treason

“EITHER THE OBAMA INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES WERE COMPLETELY INEPT OR THEY DELIBERATELY COMMITTED TREASON AGAINST A SITTING PRESIDENT…”

“Standard protocols for investigating foreign infiltration were not followed from the beginning by the Obama Administration, as their responsibility through the proper U.S. Departments was to collect data from the environment of the supposed crime, perform the threat assessment, identify the players showing there was bias by multiple parties. THE ACTUAL PARTIES WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR STAGING AND INITIATING THE FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF RUSSIA COLLUSION, WERE ACTUALLY, ACCORDING TO FEDERAL RULES OF LAW,GUILTY OF OBSTRUCTION, PERJURY, CONSPIRACY AND TREASON AMONG MULTIPLE ADDITIONAL OFFENSES…”

“The verified surveillance apparatus has been effectively explained by Mr. William Binney, Mr. Kirke Wiebe, Mr. Tom Drake, Ms. Diane Roark and Mr. Ed Loomis, and in a lawsuit against President Barack Obama by Mr. Elliott Schuchardt attached hereto. No collusion or crime was ever committed as has been actually proven by Robert Mueller from more than a year of conducting an investigation and confirmed by Rod Rosenstein, Andrew McCabe, James Clapper and Diane Feinstein, among multiple parties.”

Therefore the following United States Departments, as represented by the following personnel declared there was no collusion, without rebuttal from anyone within those Departments:

{videos are included at the website}

THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Represented by Rod Rosenstein;
THE FBI represented by Andrew McCabe;
THE ENTIRE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY represented by DNI James Clapper;
THE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE represented by Diane Feinstein.

icubudLeave a comment

THERE WERE NO GROUNDS TO HIRE SPECIAL COUNSEL IN THE FIRST PLACE

THERE WAS NEVER ANY REAL THREAT ASSESSMENT JUSTIFICATION FOR THE INVESTIGATION.

The cross referenced threat assessments from the following United States Agencies during the period of verified by showed no such assessment of the Trump For President Campaign that would warrant an investigation.The time stamped access and egress by department personnel at the following UNITED STATES Departments and Agencies pertaining to

THE INVESTIGATION WAS A COUNTER ATTACK IN RESPONSE TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NOT WINNING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND KEY OFFICIALS HAVING TO VACATE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FACILITIES, WHICH WILL EXPOSE CRIMINAL OFFENSES OF THE FORMER OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND OUTSIDE PARTIES THAT INCLUDE FOREIGN FACTIONS AVERSE TO THE VALUES OF THE UNITED STATES AND THAT SEEK TO USURP OPPORTUNITIES AND STEAL OUR RESOURCES; THE BEST DEFENSE, AN OFFENSE.

Click to read the analysis of no collusion

icubudLeave a comment

Stick with me plz

Its important to some to use labels of a derogatory nature to isolate and limit impact of beliefs contrary to their own. It seems that individuals/groups that use this type of ploy are unable to truthfully and successfully defend their own beliefs.

Today, 2018, many people have been educated and repeatedly exposed to “thinking” or maybe better put, “seeing” subjects in a briefness of depth. Images and symbols are the subject of communicating. If something contains words, well it better be of a limited number of letters/words. To plunge into an article, isn’t “the thing”. Skim for big words and pictures, if those are absent, read the title and MAYBE the first paragraph (if it is short). Slogans or bumper sticker wording and imagery is best. Think Twitter, Instagram & Tumblr. Short attention span but worse, inadequate ability/skill to honestly reason and form credible thoughts.

Most who come across this won’t read it.

So why write it?

For the 10% who may actually read it.

For the satisfaction of the writer in trying to communicate with others. Hoping in the communicating that they will locate others who are similar in thought/beliefs and if they aren’t similar, still appreciate true diversity of beliefs.

icubudLeave a comment