Why is it wrong to speak the truth?
Why is it right to change the definition of the word “truth”?
Why are the VAST minority of people expecting the VAST majority to abandon their life principles for the VAST minority?
Why is the public education system (or put another way: the FEDERAL education system) rewarded for churning out kids with mixed up understanding and woefully absent critical thinking skills?
Why is it okay for the FEDERAL education system to propagandize 8 and 10 year old children about sexuality? (Horribly sometimes even younger children!)
Why is the FEDERAL education system allowed to continue poorly and tragically equipping our society of the future?
Why is it okay for little children to see nude or darn near nude homosexuals grinding about in gay celebration parades?
Why is it that the entertainment industry is shoving the LBGTP paradigm down our throats? When they make up less than 5% of the country’s population?
Why does the entertainment industry want the LBGTP population to increase?
Why is it okay to blame almost all the ills of society on the white male population?
Why is it a microaggression when a white male refers to a individual of color as African-American when we were told to refer to this demographic as such?
Why is it a trigger to then refer to an African-American, “black” when you say it is a “microaggression” to refer to them as African-American?
Why is it that the so-called higher learning systems are doing their very best to make the future generation of leaders so sensitive or victim-trigger waiting?
Why is a man who is actually working for free for our country and he is trying to remove all the barriers to each individuals ability to succeed/have a better quality of life?
Why are liars who horribly wound others celebrated by others as “heroes”?
Category: Reflections
Stick with me plz
Its important to some to use labels of a derogatory nature to isolate and limit impact of beliefs contrary to their own. It seems that individuals/groups that use this type of ploy are unable to truthfully and successfully defend their own beliefs.
Today, 2018, many people have been educated and repeatedly exposed to “thinking” or maybe better put, “seeing” subjects in a briefness of depth. Images and symbols are the subject of communicating. If something contains words, well it better be of a limited number of letters/words. To plunge into an article, isn’t “the thing”. Skim for big words and pictures, if those are absent, read the title and MAYBE the first paragraph (if it is short). Slogans or bumper sticker wording and imagery is best. Think Twitter, Instagram & Tumblr. Short attention span but worse, inadequate ability/skill to honestly reason and form credible thoughts.
Most who come across this won’t read it.
So why write it?
For the 10% who may actually read it.
For the satisfaction of the writer in trying to communicate with others. Hoping in the communicating that they will locate others who are similar in thought/beliefs and if they aren’t similar, still appreciate true diversity of beliefs.
Quick question
Why is Mueller working “so hard” and behaving unprofessionally and unbecoming?
Please don’t be so quick to answer the question, give me a few seconds of your time.
Is his actions and behavior simply SOP that we can trace throughout his political-law enforcement career?
Or could it be that he has been threatened with publicizing some activity/activities that were undoubtedly illegal if he fails to do what HRC/WJC/TCF and her/their globalist peers want accomplished: the take down of President Trump?
Maybe its the second and he is employing his SOP.
Just a thought.
I wonder…
I wonder what political party affiliation the majority of NRA members is?
I wonder what political party affiliation the majority of LEGAL gun owners is?
I wonder what political party affiliation the majority of people are who want to make gun ownership illegal? (Of course minus the exceptions they will make for themselves and their bodyguards.)
I wonder what political party affiliation the majority of illegal immigrants who vote is?
I wonder how many of the illegal immigrants own a gun?
I wonder what political party affiliation is of citizens who use a gun to perpetrate a crime?
If gun ownership by citizens would be illegal, I wonder what happens when the government of the USA would move against people who are not aligned to their programs and policies?
I wonder what would happen to me and my wife?
I wonder what would happen to you?
Open-minded
I lost a supposed friend last Sunday. One who had some different beliefs but was open-minded (supposedly) and we had been friends for about a year. Heck even pen-pals. Open-minded, I love that when people claim that. Yep the person was open-minded as long as I apparently didn’t believe God, the Lord Jesus Christ and Christianity. Open-minded, you underestand, as long as the beliefs are the same as theirs. Open-minded. So far in my limited life experience of almost 51 years, the person who claims such isn’t REALLY. I apparently thanked God too much in my posts when I wrote about blessings and answered prayers.
What is kind of interesting is I have been thinking about the term “open-minded” a bit recently. I had recently heard that for a Christian that being “open-minded” in essence allows ourselves to vex our souls (2 Peter 2:7-8). Put another way, it puts us in constant environments that we know we should not be a part of (ex. abstain from all appearance of evil – 1 Thess. 5:21-22). So I have been thinking about that and what that really means/implies on the whole and to my own self. I am still not sure of the whole paradigm (if that is the correct word to use) but I must agree that I have been getting a bit wore out having to skip posts by individuals who embrace a lifestyle or belief system that is so contrary to mine. I know not everyone agrees with everyone else on everything so that isn’t the issue. It’s more about serious systemic beliefs that I understand to be wrong. So then maybe the fact that the individual isn’t open-minded after all actually means that they have more serious convictions about their own beliefs than I do, which if that is true, means to me I have allowed my soul to be vexed when I was trying to be engaging and open-minded myself. Which gets me to thinking about the phrase “open-minded” and how it should be correctly used/applied. Maybe – though now I am pretty positive it is the case – the willingness to be “open-minded” isn’t always a good thing or more importantly – the right thing.
It is more important in trying to develop relationships and friendships to be true to what you know is right even if that limits the opportunities to gain friendships. After all, for a Christian, the most important relationship one should have is with the Lord. If the chief “aim” of the human being is to glorify and enjoy God I am sure that obedience to Him trumps open-mindedness for the sake of being engaging is not going to lead to success in accomplishing one’s chief aim.
Rubbing the noggin
For future reference (see “I told you so”)
1.. FED will raise interest rates if a Republican candidate becomes President in the USA.
2. The Federal Deficit will start growing again if and when the Republican nominee begins winning in the polls for the next election. Over 200 days in which the Federal Deficit has NOT GROWN one penny.
3. In the era of the next non-Democrat President we will see an economy and market free fall far worse than that of 2008.
Note these are not because of bad Republican candidates or Republican conservative policies, it is simply because they are not liberal Democrats.
4. Our Muslim President – chief empty suit – has provided his Muslim-brothers what is needed for Iran to continue and increase terrorism against the nation of Israel. And with the treaty signed, sealed and delivered to his favorite ayatollah he can say his Muslim embracing policies are accomplished. And he smirks when he will see Netanyahu – if ever again.
5. Iran within five years will have and successfully tested and brandish its nuclear weapon.
Back to the USA
6. Christians will face significant persecution in our country within the next ten years. I am talking weak preferential inconveniences. I am referring to financial and economical policies affecting people who identify themselves as Christians. And churches in the USA will lose their tax-exemption status.
That’s all for now.
